Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34447135›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2021

Bone Graft and Intraosseous Anchorage of Dental Implants for Reconstruction of the Residual Alveolar Ridge.

Yashika Bali, Ravpreet Singh, Tarunpreet Kaur Gill, Rathi Rela, Ritesh Vatsa, Priyanka Priyadarshni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yashika BaliDepartment of Prosthodontics, B.J.S Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Ravpreet SinghDepartment of Prosthodontics, BJS Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Tarunpreet Kaur GillConsultant Prosthodontist and Implantologist, Gower Crescent, Brampton (Canada), Canada.
Rathi RelaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology Nalanda Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
Ritesh VatsaDepartment of Dentistry, Sri Krishna Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India.
Priyanka PriyadarshniTutor, Department Of Prosthodontics, Patna Dental College And Hospital, Patna, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone grafting aims at better dental implant osseointegration and preserves the remaining alveolar bone in the socket. The success of various bone grafting materials plays a vital role in assessing future implant function. AIMS AND

objectivesThe present clinical trial was aimed at evaluating the results of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with and without the bioresorbable membrane in the dental implant placement. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe 20 patients were divided into two groups (

resultsFor Group I, bone levels at baseline were nonsignificant (

conclusionNonsignificant difference was observed between the two groups with and without membrane in terms of changes in bone level, percentage of bone gain, and bone defect reduction. This study concludes that the use of bone grafts significantly improves residual alveolar ridge irrespective of membrane used.

Indexed as

Bone regenerationcollagendental implantsguided bone regenerationmembranesosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID34447135
PMCPMC8375792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.