ArticleSpinal cord2022
Internal consistency and convergent validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set at discharge from first rehabilitation.
Article in Spinal cord, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of life from the patient perspective at the end of the first rehabilitation after the onset of spinal cord injury/disorder - A qualitative interview-based study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Reciprocal association between pain and quality of life after newly acquired spinal cord injury.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis study is a cross-sectional analysis using data from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study.
objectivesTo examine internal consistency and convergent validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set (QoL-BDS) at discharge from first inpatient rehabilitation.
settingThe study was performed at four rehabilitation centers in Switzerland.
methodsParticipants were Swiss residents aged over 16 years newly diagnosed with traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Measures included the QoL-BDS, World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) items, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM).
resultsA total of 495 participants were included. In all, 57% had a traumatic SCI, 71.1% a motor complete SCI, and 33.3% had tetraplegia. Mean age was 53 (SD = 16.4) years and 68% were male. No floor or ceiling effects were found. Inter-correlations were strong (0.73-0.80) and Cronbach's alpha was good (0.88). QoL-BDS mean scores were 6.4 (SD = 2.2) for life satisfaction, 5.8 (SD = 2.4) for physical health, 6.9 (SD = 2.4) for psychological health, and 6.4 (SD = 2.1) for total QoL. Correlations with reference measures were strongest for QoL-BDS total and WHOQOL general quality of life (r = 0.67), QoL-BDS physical health and WHOQOL health and daily activities (r = 0.64 and 0.53), and QoL-BDS psychological health and HADS depression and anxiety (r = -0.64 and -0.69). SCIM correlated weakly with all QoL-BDS items.
conclusionsThe QoL-BDS revealed no floor or ceiling effects and demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity in individuals with SCI assessed at discharge from first rehabilitation. This study supports the clinical routine use of the QoL-BDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34446839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.