ArticleScientific reports2021
Hydrolysis of a second Asp-Pro site at the N-terminus of NOTCH3 in inherited vascular dementia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Vascular NOTCH3 Aggregation and Disease Severity in a CADASIL Cohort - Implications for NOTCH3 Variant-Specific Disease Prediction.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic advances in factors influencing phenotypic variability in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy: a review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Three-tiered EGFr domain risk stratification for individualized NOTCH3-small vessel disease prediction.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Preferential rabbit antibody responses to C-termini of NOTCH3 peptide immunogens.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Trans-Reduction of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Proteins by Notch-Derived EGF-like Sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebrovascular pathology at the biochemical level has been informed by the study of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), a vascular disorder caused by NOTCH3 mutations. Previous work in CADASIL described N-terminal proteolysis of NOTCH3 generated by specific non-enzymatic cleavage of the first Asp-Pro sequence of the protein. Here, we investigated whether the second Asp-Pro peptide bond (residues 121-122) of NOTCH3 is cleaved in CADASIL. Monospecific antibodies were generated that recognize the neo-epitope predicted to be generated by cleavage after Asp121. These antibodies were used to localize cleavage events at Asp121 in post-mortem CADASIL and control brain tissue and to investigate factors that regulate cleavage at Asp121. We report that cleavage at Asp121 occurs at a high level in the arterial media of CADASIL cerebral arteries. Leptomeningeal arteries demonstrated substantially more cleavage product than penetrating arteries in the white matter, and control vessels harbored only a small amount of cleaved NOTCH3. Proteolysis at Asp121 occurred in purified preparations of NOTCH3 ectodomain, was increased by acidic pH and reductive conditions, and required native protein conformation for cleavage. Increasing the concentration of NOTCH3 EGF-like domain protein elevated the level of proteolysis. On the other hand, several polyanionic chemicals potently blocked cleavage at Asp121. These studies demonstrate that the NOTCH3 protein in CADASIL is cleaved in multiple locations at labile Asp-Pro peptide bonds. As such, chronic brain vascular disease, like other neurodegenerative conditions, features proteolysis of pathological proteins at multiple sites which may generate small pathological peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.