Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446701›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Seasonal Arctic sea ice forecasting with probabilistic deep learning.

Tom R Andersson, J Scott Hosking, María Pérez-Ortiz, Brooks Paige, Andrew Elliott, Chris Russell, Stephen Law, Daniel C Jones, Jeremy Wilkinson, Tony Phillips and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Increased methane emissions from oil and gas following the Soviet Union's collapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tom R AnderssonBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK. tomand@bas.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-9932
J Scott HoskingBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3646-3504
María Pérez-OrtizDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
Brooks PaigeThe Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.
Andrew ElliottThe Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-5244
Chris RussellAmazon Web Services, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1665-1759
Stephen LawThe Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3184-572X
Daniel C JonesBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8701-4506
Jeremy WilkinsonBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK.
Tony PhillipsBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK.
James ByrneBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-2377
Steffen TietscheEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-0289
Beena Balan SarojiniEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-6369
Eduardo Blanchard-WrigglesworthDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yevgeny AksenovNational Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6132-3434
Rod DownieWWF, Woking, UK.
Emily ShuckburghBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, UKRI, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T020822/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic warming has led to an unprecedented year-round reduction in Arctic sea ice extent. This has far-reaching consequences for indigenous and local communities, polar ecosystems, and global climate, motivating the need for accurate seasonal sea ice forecasts. While physics-based dynamical models can successfully forecast sea ice concentration several weeks ahead, they struggle to outperform simple statistical benchmarks at longer lead times. We present a probabilistic, deep learning sea ice forecasting system, IceNet. The system has been trained on climate simulations and observational data to forecast the next 6 months of monthly-averaged sea ice concentration maps. We show that IceNet advances the range of accurate sea ice forecasts, outperforming a state-of-the-art dynamical model in seasonal forecasts of summer sea ice, particularly for extreme sea ice events. This step-change in sea ice forecasting ability brings us closer to conservation tools that mitigate risks associated with rapid sea ice loss.

Identifiers

PMID34446701
PMCPMC8390499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.