Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446505›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Emotional states and coping methods in nursing and non-nursing students responding to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China.

Qunfang Miao, Lin Xie, Bingyu Xing, Xiaolei Wang, Shiming Tang, Hong Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Resilience and Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Italian University Students: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qunfang MiaoSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lin XieSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Bingyu XingSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaolei WangSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shiming TangSchool of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhengjiang, China.
Hong LuoClinical Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China m18106566750@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-7149
Hangzhou Normal University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the emotion, coping strategy, dealing methods and their correlation in the COVID-19 outbreak among nursing and non-nursing students. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional online survey.

participantsFull-time nursing and non-nursing undergraduate students.

main outcome measureThe Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used to determine the emotional status in the COVID-19 pandemic among nursing and non-nursing students. Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) was used to measure the emotion regulation strategies and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) was used to evaluate the coping methods among nursing and non-nursing students.

resultsIn total, 746 students including 366 nursing students and 380 non-nursing students participated in the survey. Compared with the non-nursing students, a significant decrease was noticed in GAD-7 score (p<0.01) and PHQ-9 (p<0.01) in the nursing students. The cognition re-evaluation score in the nursing students was significantly lower than that of the non-nursing students (p<0.05). In the nursing students, the score of anxiety was positively correlated with ERQ expression inhibition (p<0.01) and SCSQ negative coping (p<0.01), while the score of depression was also positively correlated with ERQ expression inhibition (p<0.01) and SCSQ negative coping (p<0.01). There was a negative correlation between SCSQ and the scores of anxiety (p<0.05) and depression (p<0.05). In the non-nursing students, the anxiety score was positively correlated with the SCSQ negative coping (p<0.01), while the depression score was positively correlated with the ERQ expression inhibition (p<0.01) and SCSQ negative coping (p<0.01).

conclusionsCOVID-19 affected the emotional status of nursing and non-nursing students. The emotional status was correlated with the emotional regulation and coping methods. Staff involved in the nursing professionals should pay attention to the psychological status of the nursing and non-nursing students, and give moderate psychological interference in the presence of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, NursingAdaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19infection controlmedical ethics

Identifiers

PMID34446505
PMCPMC8392730
OpenAlexW3194916506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.