Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446504›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Spironolactone for adult female acne (SAFA): protocol for a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III randomised study of spironolactone as systemic therapy for acne in adult women.

Susanne Renz, Fay Chinnery, Beth Stuart, Laura Day, Ingrid Muller, Irene Soulsby, Jacqui Nuttall, Karen Thomas, Kim Suzanne Thomas, Tracey Sach and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Scientometric analysis of trends in global research on acne treatment.International journal of women's dermatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne RenzSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-7240
Fay ChinnerySouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Beth StuartSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Laura DaySouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ingrid MullerPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-6133
Irene SoulsbyPPI representative, Wickham, UK.
Jacqui NuttallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Karen ThomasAcne Support, PPI representative, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Kim Suzanne ThomasSchool of Medicine, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7785-7465
Tracey SachHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Louise StantonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Matthew J RiddPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-8823
Nick FrancisPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8939-7312
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Zina EmintonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alison M LaytonHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK m.santer@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-5260
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcne is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases worldwide and can have significant psychosocial impact and cause permanent scarring. Spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic, has antiandrogenic properties, potentially reducing sebum production and hyperkeratinisation in acne-prone follicles. Dermatologists have prescribed spironolactone for acne in women for over 30 years, but robust clinical study data are lacking. This study seeks to evaluate whether spironolactone is clinically effective and cost-effective in treating acne in women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women (≥18 years) with persistent facial acne requiring systemic therapy are randomised to receive one tablet per day of 50 mg spironolactone or a matched placebo until week 6, increasing to up to two tablets per day (total of 100 mg spironolactone or matched placebo) until week 24, along with usual topical therapy if desired. Study treatment stops at week 24; participants are informed of their treatment allocation and enter an unblinded observational follow-up period for up to 6 months (up to week 52 after baseline). Primary outcome is the Acne-specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) symptom subscale score at week 12. Secondary outcomes include Acne-QoL total and subscales; participant acne self-assessment recorded on a 6-point Likert scale at 6, 12, 24 weeks and up to 52 weeks; Investigator's Global Assessment at weeks 6 and 12; cost and cost effectiveness are assessed over 24 weeks. Aiming to detect a group difference of 2 points on the Acne-QoL symptom subscale (SD 5.8, effect size 0.35), allowing for 20% loss to follow-up, gives a sample size of 398 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee (18/WA/0420). Follow-up to be completed in early 2022. Findings will be disseminated to participants, peer-reviewed journals, networks and patient groups, on social media, on the study website and the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit website to maximise impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12892056;Pre-results.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisSpironolactoneAdultClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeSpironolactoneacneadult dermatologydermatology

Identifiers

PMID34446504
PMCPMC8395279
OpenAlexW3195755593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.