Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446497›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Dosing of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal In Septic Shock (DECRISS): protocol of a prospective, randomised, adaptive, multicentre clinical trial.

Anna Kanjo, Zsolt Molnar, Noémi Zádori, Noémi Gede, Bálint Erőss, Lajos Szakó, Tamás Kiss, Zsolt Márton, Manu L N G Malbrain, Konstanty Szuldrzynski and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04742764 (Dosing of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal In Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04742764 phase3suspendednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Dosing of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal In Septic Shock (DECRISS): a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PecsRan2024 to 2027Enrolled135ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsStandard medical therapy, Standard medical therapy plus cytokine removal treatment using Cytosorb, with the adsorber changed in every 12 hours, Standard medical therapy plus cytokine removal treatment using Cytosorb, with the adsorber changed in every 24 hours
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. First Experience With Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption Therapy After Lung Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna KanjoInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnarInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-4058
Noémi ZádoriInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Noémi GedeInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Lajos SzakóInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Tamás KissDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt Márton1st Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Manu L N G MalbrainInternational Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium.
Konstanty SzuldrzynskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub SzramaChair and Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy and Pain Treatment, Poznan University for Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Krzysztof KuszaChair and Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy and Pain Treatment, Poznan University for Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Klaus KogelmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Emden, Emden, Germany.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary hegyi2009@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-7259
University of Pecs · HUSemmelweis University · HUPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLJagiellonian University · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis and septic shock have mortality rates between 20% and 50%. In sepsis, the immune response becomes dysregulated, which leads to an imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. When standard therapeutic measures fail to improve patients' condition, additional therapeutic alternatives are applied to reduce morbidity and mortality. One of the most recent alternatives is extracorporeal cytokine adsorption with a device called CytoSorb. This study aims to compare the efficacy of standard medical therapy and continuous extracorporeal cytokine removal with CytoSorb therapy in patients with early refractory septic shock. Furthermore, we compare the dosing of CytoSorb adsorber device changed every 12 or 24 hours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: It is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre, phase III study. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to receive standard medical therapy (group A) or-in addition to standard treatment-CytoSorb therapy. CytoSorb treatment will be continuous and last for at least 24 hours, CytoSorb adsorber device will be changed every 12 (group B) or 24 hours (group C). Our primary outcome is shock reversal (no further need or a reduced (≤10% of the maximum dose) vasopressor requirement for 3 hours) and time to shock reversal (number of hours elapsed from the start of the treatment to shock reversal).Based on sample size calculation, 135 patients (1:1:1) will need to be enrolled in the study. A predefined interim analysis will be performed after reaching 50% of the planned sample size, therefore, the corrected level of significance (p value) will be 0.0294. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (OGYÉI/65049/2020). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04742764; Pre-results.

Indexed as

HemoperfusionShock, SepticCytokinesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignCytokinesadult intensive & critical careclinical trialsintensive & critical care

Identifiers

PMID34446497
PMCPMC8395301
OpenAlexW3196016234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.