Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446296›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2021

Probing mechanisms of visual spatial attention in mice.

Anderson Speed, Bilal Haider

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attention.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anderson SpeedBiomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bilal HaiderBiomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: bilal.haider@bme.gatech.edu.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Circuit and Synaptic Mechanisms of Visual Spatial AttentionR01NS109978 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAIDER, BILAL · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Directly measuring synaptic and population coupling in cortex during perceptionR01NS107968 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAIDER, BILAL · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107968NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of spatial attention for visual perception has been thoroughly studied in primates, but less so in mice. Several behavioral tasks in mice reveal spatial attentional effects, with similarities to observations in primates. Pairing these tasks with large-scale, cell-type-specific techniques could enable deeper access to underlying mechanisms, and help define the utility and limitations of resolving attentional effects on visual perception and neural activity in mice. In this Review, we evaluate behavioral and neural evidence for visual spatial attention in mice; assess how specializations of the mouse visual system and behavioral repertoire impact interpretation of spatial attentional effects; and outline how several measurement and manipulation techniques in mice could precisely test and refine models of attentional modulation across scales.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAnimalsAttentionMiceVision, OcularVisual Perceptionmousespatial attentionvisionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID34446296
PMCPMC8484049
OpenAlexW3195552405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.