ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Limitations of receiver operating characteristic curve on imbalanced data: Assist device mortality risk scores.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Can Clinicians Decide if AI-Enabled Risk Prediction Models Are Fit for Purpose for Real World Use?Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Age predicts Alzheimer's in Down syndrome better than MRI, plasma, or cognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- AI and network biology for rational polypharmacology in signaling drug design: a review.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Innovations in biomarker stratification for precision oncology.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring the Interconnections Between Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Integrated Analysis.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of air pollution on clinical pregnancy outcomes following intrauterine insemination: a machine learning-based analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Performance of chest X-ray with computer-aided detection powered by deep learning-based artificial intelligence for tuberculosis presumptive identification during case finding in the Philippines.BMC global and public health · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Reversion in Dementia Care: A Real-World Analysis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnoses Following Dementia in a Large Electronic Medical Record System.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Incorporating the STOP-BANG questionnaire improves prediction of cardiovascular events during hospitalization after myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing preeclampsia prediction: a tailored machine learning pipeline integrating resampling and ensemble models for handling imbalanced medical data.BioData mining · 2025Article
- A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable attention based breast tumor segmentation using a combination of UNet, ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning and Minimally Invasive Endoscopy: Panendoscopic Detection of Pleomorphic Lesions.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Article
- Quantification of Histone H1 Subtypes Using Targeted Proteomics.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Biomechanical modeling and imaging for knee osteoarthritis - is there a role for AI?Osteoarthritis imaging · 2024Article
- Medical Relevance, State-of-the-Art and Perspectives of "Sweet Metacode" in Liquid Biopsy Approaches.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Area under the ROC Curve has the most consistent evaluation for binary classification.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn the left ventricular assist device domain, the receiver operating characteristic is a commonly applied metric of performance of classifiers. However, the receiver operating characteristic can provide a distorted view of classifiers' ability to predict short-term mortality due to the overwhelmingly greater proportion of patients who survive, that is, imbalanced data. This study illustrates the ambiguity of the receiver operating characteristic in evaluating 2 classifiers of 90-day left ventricular assist device mortality and introduces the precision recall curve as a supplemental metric that is more representative of left ventricular assist device classifiers in predicting the minority class.
methodsThis study compared the receiver operating characteristic and precision recall curve for 2 classifiers for 90-day left ventricular assist device mortality, HeartMate Risk Score and Random Forest for 800 patients (test group) recorded in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device between 2006 and 2016 (mean age, 59 years; 146 female vs 654 male patients), in whom 90-day mortality rate is only 8%.
resultsThe receiver operating characteristic indicates similar performance of Random Forest and HeartMate Risk Score classifiers with respect to area under the curve of 0.77 and Random Forest 0.63, respectively. This is in contrast to their precision recall curve with area under the curve of 0.43 versus 0.16 for Random Forest and HeartMate Risk Score, respectively. The precision recall curve for HeartMate Risk Score showed the precision rapidly decreased to only 10% with slightly increasing sensitivity.
conclusionsThe receiver operating characteristic can portray an overly optimistic performance of a classifier or risk score when applied to imbalanced data. The precision recall curve provides better insight about the performance of a classifier by focusing on the minority class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.