Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446124›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2021

Mumps outbreak among fully vaccinated school-age children and young adults, Portugal 2019/2020.

Mariana Perez Duque, Ana San-Bento, Lourdes Léon, Paula Custódio, Maria Anjos Esperança, Maria João Albuquerque, Marina Nascimento, Sooria Balasegaram, Rita Sá Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatial Effect of Ecological Environmental Factors on Mumps in China during 2014-2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariana Perez DuqueDirectorate-General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9999-8402
Ana San-BentoDirectorate-General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Lourdes LéonPublic Health Unit, ACES Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal.
Paula CustódioPublic Health Unit, ACES Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal.
Maria Anjos EsperançaPublic Health Unit, ACES Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal.
Maria João AlbuquerqueDirectorate-General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marina NascimentoDirectorate-General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sooria BalasegaramEuropean Program for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Rita Sá MachadoDirectorate-General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On 16-17 January 2020, four suspected mumps cases were reported to the local Public Health Authorities with an epidemiological link to a local school and football club. Of 18 suspected cases identified, 14 were included in this study. Laboratory results confirmed mumps virus as the cause and further sequencing identified genotype G. Our findings highlight that even with a high MMR vaccine coverage, mumps outbreaks in children and young adults can occur. Since most of the cases had documented immunity for mumps, we hypothesise that waning immunity or discordant mumps virus strains are likely explanations for this outbreak.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAdolescentChildFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMumpsMumps virusPortugalVaccinationYoung AdultMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMMR vaccinationMumpsOutbreaksVaccine preventable diseasesVirology

Identifiers

PMID34446124
PMCPMC8447046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.