Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446078›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2021

Technology dictates algorithms: recent developments in read alignment.

Mohammed Alser, Jeremy Rotman, Dhrithi Deshpande, Kodi Taraszka, Huwenbo Shi, Pelin Icer Baykal, Harry Taegyun Yang, Victor Xue, Sergey Knyazev, Benjamin D Singer and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-read sequencing for neurological disorders: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Approaches to Studying Viral Pangenome Variation Graphs.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Panaln: indexing pangenome for read alignment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohammed Alser *Computer Science Department, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jeremy Rotman *Department of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Dhrithi DeshpandeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Kodi TaraszkaDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Huwenbo ShiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Pelin Icer BaykalDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA.
Harry Taegyun YangDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Victor XueDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Sergey KnyazevDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA.
Benjamin D SingerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Brunilda BalliuDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
David KoslickiComputer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16801, USA.
Pavel SkumsDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA.
Alex ZelikovskyDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA.
Can AlkanComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, 06800 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey.
Onur Mutlu *Computer Science Department, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Serghei Mangul *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. serghei.mangul@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4770-3443
University of California, Los Angeles · USBilkent University · TRGeorgia State University · USUniversity of Southern California · USBroad Institute · USNorthwestern University · USPennsylvania State University · USSechenov University · RU

Funding

Technology CoreU19AI135964 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI RICHARD G WUNDERINK · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
Mechanisms of regulatory T cell-mediated recovery from severe viral pneumoniaR01HL149883 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Benjamin David Singer · 2020 to 2026
$4.1M
Novel algorithms and hardware designs for ultra-fast next-gen sequence analysisR01HG006004 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MUTLU, ONUR · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
QUBBD: VIRAL EVOLUTION AND SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE IN COMPLEX NETWORK: BIG DATA ANALYSIS AND MODELINGR01EB025022 · NIBIB · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SKUMS, PAVEL, VANNBERG, FREDRIK · 2017 to 2019
$891k
Regulatory T cell Uhrf1 and DNA methylation in repair of acute lung injuryK08HL128867 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SINGER, BENJAMIN DAVID · 2015 to 2019
$779k
Epigenetic modifiers of regulatory T cell function following viral pneumoniaR01HL153122 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SINGER, BENJAMIN DAVID · 2021 to 2021
$63k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006004NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL128867NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149883NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153122NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135964NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aligning sequencing reads onto a reference is an essential step of the majority of genomic analysis pipelines. Computational algorithms for read alignment have evolved in accordance with technological advances, leading to today's diverse array of alignment methods. We provide a systematic survey of algorithmic foundations and methodologies across 107 alignment methods, for both short and long reads. We provide a rigorous experimental evaluation of 11 read aligners to demonstrate the effect of these underlying algorithms on speed and efficiency of read alignment. We discuss how general alignment algorithms have been tailored to the specific needs of various domains in biology.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSequence AlignmentComputational BiologyGenome, HumanHIVHumansMetagenomicsSulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID34446078
PMCPMC8390189
OpenAlexW3008701988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.