Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34446040›Full record

ReviewChiropractic & manual therapies2021

Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review.

Paul S Nolet, Hainan Yu, Pierre Côté, Anne-Laure Meyer, Vicki L Kristman, Deborah Sutton, Kent Murnaghan, Nadège Lemeunier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acupoint Sensitivity in Health and Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A modern way to teach and practice manual therapy.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Paul S NoletDepartment of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. p.nolet@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3614-225X
Hainan YuInstitute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pierre CôtéInstitute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anne-Laure MeyerInstitut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, Toulouse, France.
Vicki L KristmanEPID@Work Research Institute, Department of Health Sciences, and the Division of Human Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah SuttonInstitute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kent MurnaghanCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nadège LemeunierFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAOntario Tech University · CAInstitute for Work & Health · CAL’Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatic or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults.

methodWe systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2019. We critically appraised internal validity of studies using QAREL and QUADAS-2 instruments. We stratified results using best-evidence synthesis. Validity studies were classified according to Sackett and Haynes.

resultsWe identified 2023 eligible articles, of which 14 were low risk of bias. Evidence suggests that reliability of soft tissue structures palpation is inconsistent, and reliability of bony structures and joint mobility palpation is poor. We found preliminary evidence that gluteal muscle palpation for tenderness may be valid in differentiating LBP patients with and without radiculopathy.

conclusionReliability of manual palpation tests in the assessment of LBP patients varies greatly. This is problematic because these tests are commonly used by manual therapists and clinicians. Little is known about the validity of these tests; therefore, their clinical utility is uncertain. High quality validity studies are needed to inform the clinical use of manual palpation tests.

Indexed as

Low Back PainRadiculopathyAdultHumansPalpationRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsAssessmentLow back painManual palpationReliabilitySystematic reviewValidity

Identifiers

PMID34446040
PMCPMC8390263
OpenAlexW3195838166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.