Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34445911›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2021

Adjusting for selection bias due to missing data in electronic health records-based research.

Sarah B Peskoe, David Arterburn, Karen J Coleman, Lisa J Herrinton, Michael J Daniels, Sebastien Haneuse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Data Provenance in Biomedical Research: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah B PeskoeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-3606
David ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Karen J ColemanKaiser Permanente Department of Research & Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lisa J HerrintonKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA.
Michael J DanielsDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sebastien HaneuseDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4963-0655

Funding

Long-term Benefits and Risks of Bariatric Surgery in Integrated Care SystemsR01DK105960 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ARTERBURN, DAVID ERIC, COLEMAN, KAREN JACQUELINE · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While electronic health records data provide unique opportunities for research, numerous methodological issues must be considered. Among these, selection bias due to incomplete/missing data has received far less attention than other issues. Unfortunately, standard missing data approaches (e.g. inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation) generally fail to acknowledge the complex interplay of heterogeneous decisions made by patients, providers, and health systems that govern whether specific data elements in the electronic health records are observed. This, in turn, renders the missing-at-random assumption difficult to believe in standard approaches. In the clinical literature, the collection of decisions that gives rise to the observed data is referred to as the

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsBiasHumansProbabilitySelection BiasElectronic health recordsinverse probability weightingmissing dataselection bias

Identifiers

PMID34445911
PMCPMC10942747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.