Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34445728›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Signaling Pathways and Downstream Effectors of Host Innate Immunity in Plants.

Jitendra Kumar, Ayyagari Ramlal, Kamal Kumar, Anita Rani, Vachaspati Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Physiological and molecular profiling unveils oat (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Research Progress of ATGs Involved in Plant Immunity and NPR1 Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jitendra KumarBangalore Bioinnovation Centre, Life Sciences Park, Electronics City Phase 1, Bengaluru 560100, India.
Ayyagari RamlalDivision of Genetics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-9877
Kamal KumarSchool of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110066, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9910-7665
Anita RaniDepartment of Botany, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110003, India.
Vachaspati MishraDepartment of Botany, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytopathogens, such as biotrophs, hemibiotrophs and necrotrophs, pose serious stress on the development of their host plants, compromising their yields. Plants are in constant interaction with such phytopathogens and hence are vulnerable to their attack. In order to counter these attacks, plants need to develop immunity against them. Consequently, plants have developed strategies of recognizing and countering pathogenesis through pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Pathogen perception and surveillance is mediated through receptor proteins that trigger signal transduction, initiated in the cytoplasm or at the plasma membrane (PM) surfaces. Plant hosts possess microbe-associated molecular patterns (P/MAMPs), which trigger a complex set of mechanisms through the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and resistance (R) genes. These interactions lead to the stimulation of cytoplasmic kinases by many phosphorylating proteins that may also be transcription factors. Furthermore, phytohormones, such as salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene, are also effective in triggering defense responses. Closure of stomata, limiting the transfer of nutrients through apoplast and symplastic movements, production of antimicrobial compounds, programmed cell death (PCD) are some of the primary defense-related mechanisms. The current article highlights the molecular processes involved in plant innate immunity (PII) and discusses the most recent and plausible scientific interventions that could be useful in augmenting PII.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, InnateSignal TransductionChromatinPlant Growth RegulatorsPlantsChromatinPlant Growth Regulatorsdefensive pathwaysETIphytohormonesplant immunityPTIsignaling mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID34445728
PMCPMC8396522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.