Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34445406›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

RT-qPCR Diagnostics: The "Drosten" SARS-CoV-2 Assay Paradigm.

Stephen Bustin, Sara Kirvell, Jim F Huggett, Tania Nolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen BustinMedical Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University Chelmsford, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-6098
Sara KirvellMedical Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University Chelmsford, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.
Jim F HuggettNational Measurement Laboratory, LGC, Queens Rd, Teddington, London TW11 0LY, UK.
Tania NolanMedical Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University Chelmsford, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is an established tool for the diagnosis of RNA pathogens. Its potential for automation has caused it to be used as a presence/absence diagnostic tool even when RNA quantification is not required. This technology has been pushed to the forefront of public awareness by the COVID-19 pandemic, as its global application has enabled rapid and analytically sensitive mass testing, with the first assays targeting three viral genes published within days of the publication of the SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence. One of those, targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene, has been heavily criticised for supposed scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level, and this criticism has been extrapolated to doubts about the validity of RT-qPCR for COVID-19 testing in general. We have analysed this assay in detail, and our findings reveal some limitations but also highlight the robustness of the RT-qPCR methodology for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Nevertheless, whilst our data show that some errors can be tolerated, it is always prudent to confirm that the primer and probe sequences complement their intended target, since, when errors do occur, they may result in a reduction in the analytical sensitivity. However, in this case, it is unlikely that a mismatch will result in poor specificity or a significant number of false-positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses, especially as this is routinely checked by diagnostic laboratories as part of their quality assurance.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPandemicsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityTemperatureRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRNA, ViralCOVID-19molecular diagnosisqPCRreverse transcriptionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34445406
PMCPMC8395416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.