Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34445213›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit.

Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Iván Ortiz-Garcia, Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra, Enrique Núñez-Márquez, Jesús Moreno-Muñoz, José Luis Rondón-Romero, Daniel Cabanillas-Balsera, Javier Gil, Fernando Muñoz-Guzón, Loreto Monsalve-Guil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eugenio Velasco-OrtegaComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0228-484X
Iván Ortiz-GarciaComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Alvaro Jiménez-GuerraComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Enrique Núñez-MárquezComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Jesús Moreno-MuñozComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
José Luis Rondón-RomeroComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Daniel Cabanillas-BalseraComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-6458
Javier GilBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-1412
Fernando Muñoz-GuzónIbone Lab SL, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-1526
Loreto Monsalve-GuilComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Universidad de Sevilla · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titanium surface is an important factor in achieving osseointegration during the early wound healing of dental implants in alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sandblasted-etched surface implants to investigate the osseointegration. In the present study, we used two different types of sandblasted-etched surface implants, an SLA™ surface and a Nanoblast Plus™ surface. Roughness and chemical composition were evaluated by a white light interferometer microscope and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The SLA™ surface exhibited the higher values (Ra 3.05 μm) of rugosity compared to the Nanoblast Plus™ surface (Ra 1.78 μm). Both types of implants were inserted in the femoral condyles of ten New Zealand white rabbits. After 12 weeks, histological and histomorphometric analysis was performed. All the implants were osseointegrated and no signs of infection were observed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone-implant contact % (BIC) ratio was similar around the SLA™ implants (63.74 ± 13.61) than around the Nanoblast Plus™ implants (62.83 ± 9.91). Both implant surfaces demonstrated a favorable bone response, confirming the relevance of the sandblasted-etched surface on implant osseointegration.

Indexed as

FemurImplants, ExperimentalOsseointegrationTitaniumAnimalsRabbitsSurface PropertiesTitaniumimplant surfaceosseointegrationsandblasted and acid-etched surface

Identifiers

PMID34445213
PMCPMC8395172
OpenAlexW3193124158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.