Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34445044›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Implementation of the Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes in Vietnam: Marketing Practices by the Industry and Perceptions of Caregivers and Health Workers.

Tuan T Nguyen, Ha T T Tran, Jennifer Cashin, Van D C Nguyen, Amy Weissman, Trang T Nguyen, Bridget Kelly, Roger Mathisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Awareness, Perceptions, Gaps, and Uptake of Maternity Protection among Formally Employed Women in Vietnam.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tuan T NguyenAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-430X
Ha T T TranResearch and Training Center for Community Development, Hanoi 11616, Vietnam.
Jennifer CashinAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-7906
Van D C NguyenResearch and Training Center for Community Development, Hanoi 11616, Vietnam.
Amy WeissmanAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-2510-3500
Trang T NguyenResearch and Training Center for Community Development, Hanoi 11616, Vietnam.
Bridget KellySchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3111-6279
Roger MathisenAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-4475-8716

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP50838Irish Aid NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe promotion of breastmilk substitutes (BMS) is an important barrier to successful breastfeeding.

objectiveTo examine the enactment and implementation of the Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes (the Code) in Vietnam with a focus on marketing practices by the baby food industry and perceptions of caregivers, health workers, and policy makers.

methodsFrom May to July 2020, we conducted a mixed-method, cross-sectional study including a survey of 268 pregnant women and 726 mothers of infants aged 0-11 months and in-depth interviews with a subset of interviewed women (

resultsIn the previous 30 days, two mothers (out of 726) participating in the quantitative survey reported that health workers had recommended BMS, at private hospitals in both cases. In-depth interviews with health workers showed that hospitals have internal procedures to prevent the promotion of BMS by health workers. However, companies employed representatives to promote products not covered under the Code (e.g., commercial milk formula for pregnant women) at antenatal care visits and by gaining contact information from women and using this information to promote BMS outside the hospital, often on social media. In the 30 days preceding the survey, one-fifth of pregnant women were exposed to promotions of commercial milk formula for pregnant women and 7.1% to promotions of BMS. Among mothers of infants, 7.3% and 10.7% of respondents with infants aged 0-5 and 6-11 months, respectively, were exposed to some form of BMS promotion in the past 30 days. Around the time of birth, parents commonly brought BMS to maternity facilities (52.5%) or purchased it nearby (35.4%).

conclusionsAlthough Vietnam has a strong regulatory environment for the protection, promotion, and support of breastfeeding, there are implementation, monitoring, and enforcement gaps. Stronger enforcement of national policies to regulate the presence of BMS industry representatives in health facilities-both public and private-and the promotion of BMS products on digital platforms are needed.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood IndustryHealth PersonnelHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMarketingMilk SubstitutesMothersNutrition PolicyPerceptionPregnancybreastmilk substitutesCode of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes (the Code)infantmixed-method studyVietnam

Identifiers

PMID34445044
PMCPMC8399411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.