Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34445010›Full record

ReviewNutrients2021

Nutrition in the Intensive Care Unit-A Narrative Review.

Aileen Hill, Gunnar Elke, Arved Weimann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aileen HillDepartment of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7013-3357
Gunnar ElkeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-1605
Arved WeimannDepartment of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Klinikum St. Georg, D-04129 Leipzig, Germany.
Klinikum St. Georg · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

Landesprogramm für chancengerechte Hochschulmedizin, Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile consent exists, that nutritional status has prognostic impact in the critically ill, the optimal feeding strategy has been a matter of debate.

methodsNarrative review of the recent evidence and international guideline recommendations focusing on basic principles of nutrition in the ICU and the treatment of specific patient groups. Covered topics are: the importance and diagnosis of malnutrition in the ICU, the optimal timing and route of nutrition, energy and protein requirements, the supplementation of specific nutrients, as well as monitoring and complications of a Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT). Furthermore, this review summarizes the available evidence to optimize the MNT of patients grouped by primarily affected organ system.

resultsDue to the considerable heterogeneity of the critically ill, MNT should be carefully adapted to the individual patient with special focus on phase of critical illness, metabolic tolerance, leading symptoms, and comorbidities.

conclusionMNT in the ICU is complex and requiring an interdisciplinary approach and frequent reevaluation. The impact of personalized and disease-specific MNT on patient-centered clinical outcomes remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Critical CareFood, FormulatedNutritional StatusNutritional SupportEnergy IntakeEnteral NutritionHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalnutritionNutritive ValueParenteral NutritionTreatment Outcomecritical careenergyenteral nutritionmedical nutrition therapymicronutrientsparenteral nutritionproteinreview

Identifiers

PMID34445010
PMCPMC8400249
OpenAlexW3193491971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.