Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444951›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions on College Students' Dietary Quality and Experience of the Food Environment.

Francilia Brito Silva, Dawn E Osborn, Meghan R Owens, Tracie Kirkland, Carolyn E Moore, Mindy A Patterson, Wesley J Tucker, Derek C Miketinas, Kathleen E Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. COVID-19 and changes in young adults' weight concerns.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Food Insecurity in Higher Education: A Contemporary Review of Impacts and Explorations of Solutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francilia Brito SilvaDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX 76024, USA.
Dawn E OsbornDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX 76024, USA.
Meghan R OwensDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Tracie KirklandDepartment of Nursing, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Carolyn E MooreDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Mindy A PattersonDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1391-4656
Wesley J TuckerDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Derek C MiketinasDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5462-1396
Kathleen E DavisDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX 76024, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-1861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions sent college students online and off campus, potentially reducing access to healthy food. The objective of this cross-sectional, internet-based study was to use qualitative and quantitative survey methods to evaluate whether COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in Texas, USA affected college students' ability to buy food, how/what they shopped for, how they prepared food, what they ate, how they felt about eating, and overall dietary quality (assessed using Healthy Eating Index [HEI] scores). Survey responses from 502 students (87.5% female; 59.6% nonwhite, mean age 27.5 ± 0.4 years, >50% graduate students) were analyzed. The qualitative analysis of open-ended questions revealed 110 codes, 17 subthemes, and six themes. Almost all students experienced changes in at least one area, the most common being changes in shopping habits. Participants with low or very low food security had lower HEI scores compared to food secure students (

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDietDiet, HealthyEvaluation Studies as TopicFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood AssistanceFood SecurityHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2StudentsTexascoronavirusdietary qualityfood preparationfood securityhealthy eating indexqualitative assessmentshopping habits

Identifiers

PMID34444951
PMCPMC8400929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.