Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444877›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores Vary by Types of Food Outlets in the United States.

Magdalena Vinyard, Meghan Zimmer, Kirsten A Herrick, Mary Story, Wenyen Juan, Jill Reedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dietary approaches for normalizing dysbiosis induced by high-fat, obesogenic diets.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena VinyardEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Risk Factor Assessment Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Meghan ZimmerEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Risk Factor Assessment Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-8847
Kirsten A HerrickEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Risk Factor Assessment Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Mary StoryGlobal Health and Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Wenyen JuanCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
Jill ReedyEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Risk Factor Assessment Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet quality in the United States is improving over time but remains poor. Food outlets influence diet quality and represent the environments in which individuals make choices about food purchases and intake. The objective of this study was to use the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) to evaluate the quality of foods consumed from the four major outlets where food is obtained-stores, full-service restaurants, quick-services restaurants, and schools-and to assess changes over time. This cross-sectional study used 24 h dietary recall data from eight cycles (2003-2004 to 2017-2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Linear trend estimation was used to test for changes in HEI scores over time, and balanced repeated replicate weighted linear regression was used to test for differences in total and component scores between types of food outlets. Overall, Americans are not consuming a mix of foods from any major category of food outlet that aligns with dietary guidelines. The total score for schools (65/100 points) and stores (62/100 points) was significantly higher than full-service (51/100 points) and quick-service (39/100 points) restaurants (

Indexed as

Food PreferencesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFemaleFood MarketsFood ServicesFood SupplyHumansLinear Modelsdietary patternsfood environmentHEI-2015National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)nutrition policyWhat We Eat in America

Identifiers

PMID34444877
PMCPMC8398800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.