Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444870›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Gut Microbiota Differences According to Ultra-Processed Food Consumption in a Spanish Population.

Amanda Cuevas-Sierra, Fermín I Milagro, Paula Aranaz, Jose Alfredo Martínez, José I Riezu-Boj

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda Cuevas-SierraDepartment of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-2566
Fermín I MilagroDepartment of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3228-9916
Paula AranazCenter for Nutrition Research, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1282-0079
Jose Alfredo MartínezDepartment of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-6941
José I Riezu-BojDepartment of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1885-8457

Funding

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición CB12/03/30002Gobierno de Navarra 0011-1411-2018-000040Gobierno de Navarra PI035Gobierno de Navarra PT024Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades RTI2018-102205-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) consumption could affect gut microbiota diversity and profile. We aimed to evaluate the effects of UPFs on microbiota, considering the role of sex. The consumption of UPFs (using NOVA criteria) was assessed with a validated 137-item food-frequency questionnaire. Participants (

Indexed as

Food HandlingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultBacteriaDairy ProductsDietDysbiosisFast FoodsFecesFemaleHumansIntestinesMaleMiddle AgedNutritive ValueRisk AssessmentBacteroidetesBifidobacteriummicrobiotasex-differencesultra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID34444870
PMCPMC8398738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.