ArticleNutrients2021
High BMI Predicts Attention to Less Healthy Product Sets: Can a Prompt Lead to Consideration of Healthier Sets of Products?
Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Changes and Their Predictors in the First Year After Childbirth in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Post Hoc Longitudinal Analysis from the Face-it Trial.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Trial
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of health outcomes following diabetes risk reduction diet (DRRD).Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Health Prompts Affect Consideration of Health but Not Intertemporal Preferences While Promoting Healthier Food Choices.Nutrients · 2024Article
- The impact of health and environmental messaging with and without product filtering in complex retail markets: the case of pulses.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Eating contexts determine the efficacy of nutrient warning labels to promote healthy food choices.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Active Consideration of Future Health Can Be Prompted by Simple Health Messages and Improves Nutritional Quality of Food Choices.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the food environment has been implicated in diet-related health disparities, individuals' ability to shape the food environment by limiting attention to a subset of products has not been studied. We examine the relationship between BMI category and consideration set-the products the individual considers before making a final choice-in an online hypothetical shopping experiment. Specifically, we focus on the healthiness of the consideration set the individual selected. Secondly, we examined the interaction of a health prompt (versus a no-prompt control) with BMI category on the healthiness of the consideration set. We used linear probability models to document the relationship between weight status and consideration set, between prompt and consideration set, and the effect of the interaction between prompt and weight status on consideration set. We found that (1) obese individuals are 10% less likely to shop from a consideration set that includes the healthy options, (2) viewing the prompt increased the probability of choosing a healthy consideration set by 9%, and (3) exposure to the prompt affected individuals in different BMI categories equally. While obese individuals are more likely to ignore healthier product options, a health-focused prompt increases consideration of healthy options across all BMI categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.