Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444652›Full record

ReviewNutrients2021

Lactoferrin and Its Detection Methods: A Review.

Yingqi Zhang, Chao Lu, Jin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Translating Biomarker Discovery: From Bench to Bedside in Dry Eye Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingqi ZhangDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7507-8724
Chao LuDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-7927
Jin ZhangDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6875-8008
Western University · CA

Funding

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2021-03859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactoferrin (LF) is one of the major functional proteins in maintaining human health due to its antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities. Abnormal levels of LF in the human body are related to some serious diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, Alzheimer's disease and dry eye disease. Recent studies indicate that LF can be used as a biomarker for diagnosis of these diseases. Many methods have been developed to detect the level of LF. In this review, the biofunctions of LF and its potential to work as a biomarker are introduced. In addition, the current methods of detecting lactoferrin have been presented and discussed. We hope that this review will inspire efforts in the development of new sensing systems for LF detection.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesChromatographyElectrophoresis, CapillaryImmunoassayAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBiomarkersDry Eye SyndromesFecesHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesLactoferrinPredictive Value of TestsSalivaTearsBiomarkersLactoferrinbiomarkersimmunoassayinstrumental analysislactoferrinsensor

Identifiers

PMID34444652
PMCPMC8398339
OpenAlexW3185159821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.