Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444650›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Polymorphisms Contributing to Calcium Status: A Systematic Review.

Katharina da Silva Lopes, Sarah Krull Abe

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina da Silva LopesGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1625-135X
Sarah Krull AbeCenter for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Division of Prevention, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3991-2739
St. Luke's International University · JP

Funding

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Reference 2020/1062772-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review assessed genotypes and changes in calcium homeostasis. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, Medline and CENTRAL on 7 August 2020 identifying 1012 references. Studies were included with any human population related to the topic of interest, and genetic variations in genes related to calcium metabolism were considered. Two reviewers independently screened references, extracted relevant data and assessed study quality using the Q-Genie tool. Forty-one studies investigating Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in relation to calcium status were identified. Almost half of the included studies were of good study quality according to the Q-Genie tool. Seventeen studies were cross-sectional, 14 case-control, seven association and three were Mendelian randomization studies. Included studies were conducted in over 18 countries. Participants were mainly adults, while six studies included children and adolescents. Ethnicity was described in 31 studies and half of these included Caucasian participants. Twenty-six independent studies examined the association between calcium and polymorphism in the calcium-sensing receptor (

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideCalciumCalcium, DietaryDietary SupplementsFemaleGenotypeHomeostasisHumansMaleReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Calcium-SensingCalciumCalcium, DietaryReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Calcium-SensingVDR protein, humancalcium homeostasiscalcium requirementsgenetic factorspolymorphismSNPs

Identifiers

PMID34444650
PMCPMC8398213
OpenAlexW3186081662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.