Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444605›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Dietary Supplementation, before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey in the Lebanese Population.

Hala Mohsen, Nour Yazbeck, Ayoub Al-Jawaldeh, Nazih Bou Chahine, Houssein Hamieh, Youmna Mourad, Farouk Skaiki, Hassan Salame, Pascale Salameh, Maha Hoteit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hala MohsenFaculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Beirut 6573, Lebanon.
Nour YazbeckFaculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Beirut 6573, Lebanon.
Ayoub Al-JawaldehWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo 11371, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-8277
Nazih Bou ChahineFaculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Beirut 6573, Lebanon.
Houssein HamiehNehna Hadak Association, Beirut 0961, Lebanon.
Youmna MouradAl Hadi Laboratory and IVF Center, Beirut 0961, Lebanon.
Farouk SkaikiAlKarim Laboratory, Saida 0961, Lebanon.
Hassan SalameLebanese University Task Force, Lebanese University, Beirut 6573, Lebanon.
Pascale SalamehFaculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Beirut 6573, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-4780-0772
Maha HoteitFaculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Beirut 6573, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-7392-4835
Lebanese University · LBWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean · EG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the start of 2020, a new coronavirus (COVID-19) invaded the world leading to the death of 3.92 million people. Sadly, to date, no remedy has been discovered for this virus. Preventive vaccines have been under investigation, but were unavailable until December 2020. Clinical deficiencies of nutrients may increase susceptibility to infections. This knowledge may have provided an incentive for some dietary supplement (DS) manufacturers to advertise their products as COVID-19 preventatives or cures without any substantiation, targeting mainly social media fans. The objective of this research was to assess the usage, knowledge and attitudes towards dietary supplementation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among Lebanese people. A cross-sectional study was conducted based on a convenience sample (N = 2966) and information from participants aged 18 years and above was collected about periods before and during the pandemic. Our findings showed that attitudes towards DSs changed when the pandemic emerged and people believed that DSs can improve their health and strengthen their immunity. Despite the rise in DS prescription by healthcare professionals, the prevalence of DS use decreased from 73.3% before the pandemic to 69.9% during the pandemic (

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesattitudeCOVID-19dietaryknowledgeLebanese populationpracticesupplement

Identifiers

PMID34444605
PMCPMC8395050
OpenAlexW3195493907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.