Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444518›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Participatory Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the User-Friendly Patient Information Material Checklist (UPIM-Check).

Sandra Salm, Judith Mollenhauer, Carolin Hornbach, Natalia Cecon, Antje Dresen, Stefanie Houwaart, Anna Arning, Andrea Göttel, Kathrin Schwickerath, Holger Pfaff and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sandra SalmFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1392-0140
Judith MollenhauerFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Carolin HornbachFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Natalia CeconFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Antje DresenFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Stefanie HouwaartHouse of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany (HKSH-BV), Thomas-Mann-Str. 40, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
Anna ArningCancer Society North Rhine-Westphalia (KG-NRW), Volmerswerther Str. 20, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea GöttelCancer Society North Rhine-Westphalia (KG-NRW), Volmerswerther Str. 20, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Kathrin SchwickerathCancer Society North Rhine-Westphalia (KG-NRW), Volmerswerther Str. 20, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Holger PfaffFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9154-6575
Nadine ScholtenFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Theresia KriegerFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to design a user-friendly instrument to assess and optimize patient information material (PIM), (2) to develop an English version, and (3) to test its psychometric properties. The instrument was needed to optimize the top-down developed PIM of the psycho-oncological care programme isPO. First, a literature-based PIM checklist was developed by a team of patient representatives, cancer care experts and professional researchers. Next, the checklist's reliability and validity were analysed by having cancer survivors assess the initial and optimized version of the isPO-leaflet. The

Indexed as

ChecklistHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesinstrument developmentpatient engagementpatient information materialpilot studypsychometric propertiesquality assessment instrumentservice provider engagement

Identifiers

PMID34444518
PMCPMC8393725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.