Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444477›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Post-COVID-19 Rehabilitation: Perception and Experience of Austrian Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students.

Barbara Scheiber, Claudia Spiegl, Claudia Wiederin, Erika Schifferegger, Natalia Schiefermeier-Mach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long COVID and Physical Therapy: A Systematic Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara ScheiberDepartment of Physiotherapy, FH Gesundheit Tirol/Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Claudia SpieglDepartment of Physiotherapy, FH Gesundheit Tirol/Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-8189
Claudia WiederinDepartment of Physiotherapy, FH Gesundheit Tirol/Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Erika SchiffereggerDepartment of Physiotherapy, FH Gesundheit Tirol/Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Natalia Schiefermeier-MachFH Gesundheit Tirol/Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-5298
Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rehabilitation needs of COVID-19 survivors are increasingly recognized, with a focus on combating respiratory and neuromuscular dysfunctions. The aim here was to explore the perception of Austrian physiotherapists and physiotherapy students on post-COVID-19 rehabilitation care and to identify barriers for the application of sufficient rehabilitation. We analysed current knowledge and practical skills in respiratory physiotherapy, performing a cross-sectional national survey among physiotherapists working in outpatient settings and physiotherapy students in their last academic year of bachelor-level education in Austria. Out of 255 survey participants, one-third already had inquiries to treat post-COVID-19 patients, and the majority of respondents expected a further increased inflow of patients with rehabilitation needs (64.2%). Only 11.2% of respondents reported feeling sufficiently informed about post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. A total of 68.2% of students and up to 48.1% of physiotherapists favoured a COVID-19-specific adaptation already in the basic academic education, and 74.1% of survey participants indicated interest in attending specific training. Concerning respiratory physiotherapy, our data showed discrepancies between the estimation of the importance of specific examination and treatment techniques and the level of current experience. There is a clear lack of experience in implementing effective device-based respiratory therapy. Our data indicate an urgent need to develop new education and training programs with a focus on the interdisciplinary rehabilitation of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physical TherapistsAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerceptionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2Studentseducationlong COVID-19physical and rehabilitation medicinephysical therapy specialtypost-acute COVID-19 syndromerespiratory therapysurvey

Identifiers

PMID34444477
PMCPMC8394152
OpenAlexW3193985058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.