Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444473›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Socioecological Factors Associated with an Urban Exercise Prescription Program for Under-Resourced Women: A Mixed Methods Community-Engaged Research Project.

Sarah M Camhi, Gifty Debordes-Jackson, Julianna Andrews, Julie Wright, Ana Cristina Lindsay, Philip J Troped, Laura L Hayman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah M CamhiDepartment of Kinesiology, University of San Francisco, 2300 Fulton Street, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5732-1591
Gifty Debordes-JacksonDepartment of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Julianna AndrewsDepartment of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Julie WrightDepartment of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Ana Cristina LindsayDepartment of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2520-0493
Philip J TropedDepartment of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Laura L HaymanDepartment of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
University of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One strategy to promote physical activity (PA) is for health care providers to give exercise prescriptions (ExRx) that refer to community-based facilities. However, facilitators and barriers specific to urban programs in the US for under-resourced women are unknown. Thus the purpose of this formative research was to explore ExRx barriers and facilitators specific to US under-resourced women to inform future intervention targets and strategies. This mixed-methods community-engaged research was conducted in partnership with an urban women's only wellness center that exchanged ExRx for free access (1-3 months). Qualitative semi-structured interviews and validated quantitative questionnaires (SF-12, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Physical Activity Self-Efficacy, Physical Activity Stage of Change, and Barriers to Physical Activity, Social Support for Exercise, and Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale) were administered by phone and guided by the socio-ecological model. ExRx utilization was defined as number visits/week divided by membership duration. Means and percentages were compared between ≥1 visit/week vs. <1 visit/week with

Indexed as

ExerciseMotivationExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPrescriptionsQualitative ResearchSelf Efficacychronic diseaseexercise prescriptionmixed methodsphysical activitysocioecological modelunder-resourcedurbanU.S.

Identifiers

PMID34444473
PMCPMC8394072
OpenAlexW3194055040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.