ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Validation of a Brief Screening Instrument for Chemical Intolerance in a Large U.S. National Sample.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Intolerance Is Associated with Autism Spectrum and Attention Deficit Disorders: A Five-Country Cross-National Replication Analysis.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Exploration of Policy, Institutional, and Social Misconceptions Faced by Individuals with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) validity, prevalence, tools and interventions: systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with chemical intolerance.Family medicine and community health · 2025Article
- Environmental house calls can reduce symptoms of chemical intolerance: a demonstration of personalized exposure medicine.Primary health care research & development · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Factors Related to High Risk of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity among Japanese High School Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Diabetes quality of life, Chemical Intolerance, and generational status in a Latino sample: an RRNeT study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024Article
- Chemical Intolerance and Mast Cell Activation: A Suspicious Synchronicity.Journal of xenobiotics · 2023Article
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome: First Symptoms and Evolution of the Clinical Picture: Case-Control Study/Epidemiological Case-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Does improving indoor air quality lessen symptoms associated with chemical intolerance?Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemical intolerance (CI) is characterized by multisystem symptoms triggered by low levels of exposure to xenobiotics including chemicals, foods/food additives, and drugs/medications. Prior prevalence estimates vary from 8-33% worldwide. Clinicians and researchers need a brief, practical screening tool for identifying possible chemical intolerance. This large, population-based study describes the validation of a three-item screening questionnaire, the Brief Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (BREESI), against the international reference standard used for assessing chemical intolerance, the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI).
methodsMore than 10,000 people in the U.S. responded to the BREESI and the QEESI in a population-based survey. We calculated the overall prevalence of CI in this sample, as well as by gender, age, and income. Common statistical metrics were used to evaluate the BREESI as a screener for CI against the QEESI.
resultsThe prevalence estimate for QEESI-defined chemical intolerance in the U.S. was 20.39% (95% CI 19.63-21.15%). The BREESI had 91.26% sensitivity (95% CI: 89.20-93.04%) and 92.89% specificity (95% CI: 91.77-93.90%). The positive likelihood ratio was 12.83 (95% CI: 11.07-14.88), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.08-0.12). Logistic regression demonstrates that the predicted probability of CI increased sharply with each increase in the number of BREESI items endorsed (Odds Ratio: 5.3, 95% CI: 4.90-5.75).
conclusionsChemical intolerance may affect one in five people in the U.S. The BREESI is a new, practical instrument for researchers, clinicians, and epidemiologists. As a screening tool, the BREESI offers a high degree of confidence in case ascertainment. We recommend: screen with the BREESI, confirm with the QEESI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.