Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444425›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Clinical Decision Web to Predict ICU Admission or Death for Patients Hospitalised with COVID-19 Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Rocío Aznar-Gimeno, Luis M Esteban, Gorka Labata-Lezaun, Rafael Del-Hoyo-Alonso, David Abadia-Gallego, J Ramón Paño-Pardo, M José Esquillor-Rodrigo, Ángel Lanas, M Trinidad Serrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improving Intensive Care Unit Early Readmission Prediction Using Optimized and Explainable Machine Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rocío Aznar-GimenoDepartment of Big Data and Cognitive Systems, Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón, ITAINNOVA, María de Luna 7-8, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-146X
Luis M EstebanEscuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Calle Mayor, 5, 50100 La Almunia de Doña Godina, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3007-302X
Gorka Labata-LezaunDepartment of Big Data and Cognitive Systems, Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón, ITAINNOVA, María de Luna 7-8, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
Rafael Del-Hoyo-AlonsoDepartment of Big Data and Cognitive Systems, Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón, ITAINNOVA, María de Luna 7-8, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
David Abadia-GallegoDepartment of Big Data and Cognitive Systems, Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón, ITAINNOVA, María de Luna 7-8, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
J Ramón Paño-PardoInfectious Disease Department, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, San Juan Bosco 15, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
M José Esquillor-RodrigoInternal Medicine Department, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, San Juan Bosco 15, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Ángel LanasDepartment of Medicine, Psychiatry and Dermatology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-2889
M Trinidad SerranoDepartment of Medicine, Psychiatry and Dermatology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7119-2244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to build a predictive model for estimating the risk of ICU admission or mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and provide a user-friendly tool to assist clinicians in the decision-making process. The study cohort comprised 3623 patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalized in the SALUD hospital network of Aragon (Spain), which includes 23 hospitals, between February 2020 and January 2021, a period that includes several pandemic waves. Up to 165 variables were analysed, including demographics, comorbidity, chronic drugs, vital signs, and laboratory data. To build the predictive models, different techniques and machine learning (ML) algorithms were explored: multilayer perceptron, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). A reduction dimensionality procedure was used to minimize the features to 20, ensuring feasible use of the tool in practice. Our model was validated both internally and externally. We also assessed its calibration and provide an analysis of the optimal cut-off points depending on the metric to be optimized. The best performing algorithm was XGBoost. The final model achieved good discrimination for the external validation set (AUC = 0.821, 95% CI 0.787-0.854) and accurate calibration (slope = 1, intercept = -0.12). A cut-off of 0.4 provides a sensitivity and specificity of 0.71 and 0.78, respectively. In conclusion, we built a risk prediction model from a large amount of data from several pandemic waves, which had good calibration and discrimination ability. We also created a user-friendly web application that can aid rapid decision-making in clinical practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2clinical decision web toolCOVID-19ICUmachine learningmortalitypredictive model

Identifiers

PMID34444425
PMCPMC8394359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.