Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444409›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia.

Isra Al-Turaiki, Fahad Almutlaq, Hend Alrasheed, Norah Alballa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive Modeling for Pandemic Forecasting: A COVID-19 Study in New Zealand and Partner Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Dynamic hierarchical state space forecasting.Statistics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isra Al-TuraikiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-5115
Fahad AlmutlaqGeography Department, College of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9724-0400
Hend AlrasheedDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8649-5926
Norah AlballaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7095-3726

Funding

Research Center of the Female Scientific and Medical Colleges, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University. 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic's path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series data where several methods can be applied for forecasting. Although various time-series forecasting models are available, it is difficult to draw broad theoretical conclusions regarding their relative merits. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of several time-series models for forecasting COVID-19 cases, recoveries, and deaths in Saudi Arabia. In particular, seven forecasting models were trained using autoregressive integrated moving average, TBATS, exponential smoothing, cubic spline, simple exponential smoothing Holt, and HoltWinters. The models were built using publicly available daily data of COVID-19 during the period of 24 March 2020 to 5 April 2021 reported in Saudi Arabia. The experimental results indicate that the ARIMA model had a smaller prediction error in forecasting confirmed cases, which is consistent with results reported in the literature, while cubic spline showed better predictions for recoveries and deaths. As more data become available, a fluctuation in the forecasting-accuracy metrics was observed, possibly due to abrupt changes in the data.

Indexed as

COVID-19ForecastingHumansModels, StatisticalPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Saudi Arabiaautoregressive integrated moving averageCOVID-19cubic splineexponential smoothingHoltHoltWinterssimple exponential smoothingTBATStime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID34444409
PMCPMC8393561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.