Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444341›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Primary Care and Physical Literacy: A Non-Randomized Controlled Pilot Study to Combat the High Prevalence of Physically Inactive Adults in Austria.

Peter Holler, Johannes Jaunig, Othmar Moser, Silvia Tuttner, Helmut Simi, Dietmar Wallner, Frank Michael Amort, Mireille van Poppel

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development, explanation, and presentation of the Physical Literacy Interventions Reporting Template (PLIRT).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter HollerInstitute of Health Management in Tourism, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.
Johannes JaunigInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1179-6492
Othmar MoserDivision Exercise Physiology and Metabolism, Department of Sport Science, University of Bayreuth, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.
Silvia TuttnerInstitute of Health Management in Tourism, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.
Helmut SimiInstitute of Health Management in Tourism, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.
Dietmar WallnerInstitute of Health Management in Tourism, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.
Frank Michael AmortInstitute of Health Management in Tourism, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.
Mireille van PoppelInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5694-4324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multidimensional concept of physical literacy is fundamental for lifelong physical activity engagement. However, physical literacy-based interventions are in their infancy, especially among adults. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study was to assess the association of a physical literacy-based intervention with changes in self-reported physical literacy among inactive adults. A non-randomized controlled study (2 × 2 design) was conducted, comparing pre- vs. postintervention. Twenty-eight inactive healthy participants in the intervention group (89% female, 53 ± 10 years) entered a physical literacy-based intervention once weekly for 14 weeks. The non-treated control group consisted of 22 inactive adults (96% female, 50 ± 11 years). Physical literacy was evaluated with a questionnaire encompassing five domains: physical activity behavior, attitude/understanding, motivation, knowledge, and self-efficacy/confidence. ANOVA models were applied to evaluate changes by time and condition. Following the intervention, significant improvements were seen for overall physical literacy and in four out of five physical literacy domains, including physical activity behavior, attitude/understanding, knowledge, and self-efficacy/confidence (all

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSedentary BehaviorAdultAustriaFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPrevalenceadultsinterventionmeasurementphysical activityphysical inactivityphysical literacyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34444341
PMCPMC8394934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.