Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444224›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Leveraging Strategic Foresight to Advance Worker Safety, Health, and Well-Being.

Jessica M K Streit, Sarah A Felknor, Nicole T Edwards, John Howard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the future of occupational safety research: A strategic foresight approach.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Four Futures for Occupational Safety and Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  8. Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica M K StreitNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0935-2948
Sarah A FelknorNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Nicole T EdwardsNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
John HowardNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC 20024, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attending to the ever-expanding list of factors impacting work, the workplace, and the workforce will require innovative methods and approaches for occupational safety and health (OSH) research and practice. This paper explores strategic foresight as a tool that can enhance OSH capacity to anticipate, and even shape, the future as it pertains to work. Equal parts science and art, strategic foresight includes the development and analysis of plausible alternative futures as inputs to strategic plans and actions. Here, we review several published foresight approaches and examples of work-related futures scenarios. We also present a working foresight framework tailored for OSH and offer recommendations for next steps to incorporate strategic foresight into research and practice in order to advance worker safety, health, and well-being.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWorkplaceForecastingWorkforceforecastmethods and approachesoccupational safety and healthscenariostrategic foresightworker well-beingwork-related future

Identifiers

PMID34444224
PMCPMC8392230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.