Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444123›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Identification of Network Promoters in a Regional and Intersectoral Health Promotion Network: A Qualitative Social Network Analysis in Southern Germany.

Tobias Fleuren, Ansgar Thiel, Annika Frahsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias FleurenDepartment of Social and Health Sciences of Sport, Institute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Ansgar ThielDepartment of Social and Health Sciences of Sport, Institute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-0442
Annika FrahsaDepartment of Social and Health Sciences of Sport, Institute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0207-3989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health in all policies is a key approach to promote health and calls for cooperation between diverse levels of government and different sectors. In this paper, we analyze how a network called 'Healthy Region Plus' in Southern Germany addresses intersectoral cooperation at city and county levels. We aim to analyze the different roles of actors involved in the network based on the promoter model. We conducted two socio-material network mappings based on the Net-map approach by Schiffer and Hauck. The analysis followed three steps: data visualization, descriptive analysis of network properties, and interpretation of findings. Our findings reveal a complex intersectoral cooperation structure, with county and city level clusters, with network members who act as diverse power, expert, process, or relationship promoters. We also identified certain relevant sectors not to be part of the network. We discuss that the success of the network depends on the members' active participation in and their outreach beyond the existing network, between city and county levels, and across sectors to promote health and build health-promoting structures in the region.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSocial Network AnalysisGermanyGovernmentHealth PolicyIntersectoral Collaborationintersectoral cooperationparticipationsocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID34444123
PMCPMC8392189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.