Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444115›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Modelling to Forecast Symptom Complexity in an Ambulatory Oncology Clinic: Harnessing Predictive Analytics and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Linda Watson, Siwei Qi, Andrea DeIure, Claire Link, Lindsi Chmielewski, April Hildebrand, Krista Rawson, Dean Ruether

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda WatsonApplied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-0082
Siwei QiApplied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Andrea DeIureApplied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Claire LinkApplied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Lindsi ChmielewskiApplied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
April HildebrandApplied Research and Patient Experience, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Krista RawsonQuality, Safety & Practice Integration, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Dean RuetherMedical Oncology, Cancer Care Alberta-Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing incidence of cancer has led to high patient volumes and time challenges in ambulatory oncology clinics. By knowing how many patients are experiencing complex care needs in advance, clinic scheduling and staff allocation adjustments could be made to provide patients with longer or shorter timeslots to address symptom complexity. In this study, we used predictive analytics to forecast the percentage of patients with high symptom complexity in one clinic population in a given time period. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling was utilized with patient-reported outcome (PRO) data and patient demographic information collected over 24 weeks. Eight additional weeks of symptom complexity data were collected and compared to assess the accuracy of the forecasting model. The predicted symptom complexity levels were compared with observation data and a mean absolute predicting error of 5.9% was determined, indicating the model's satisfactory accuracy for forecasting symptom complexity levels among patients in this clinic population. By using a larger sample and additional predictors, this model could be applied to other clinics to allow for tailored scheduling and staff allocation based on symptom complexity forecasting and inform system level models of care to improve outcomes and provide higher quality patient care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesModels, StatisticalForecastingHumansIncidencePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresARIMAclinic schedulingforecasting modelpatient-reported outcomespredictive analyticsstaff allocationsymptom complexity levels

Identifiers

PMID34444115
PMCPMC8394538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.