Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34444083›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

"We Got an Invite into the Fortress": VA-Community Partnerships for Meeting Veterans' Healthcare Needs.

Carol J Ward, Curtis Child, Bret L Hicken, S Matthew Stearmer, Michael R Cope, Scott R Sanders, Jorden E Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carol J WardDepartment of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0830-8483
Curtis ChildDepartment of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Bret L HickenVHA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1000-8773
S Matthew StearmerThe Ohio Department of Medicaid, Upper Arlington, OH 43221, USA.
Michael R CopeDepartment of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7753-2812
Scott R SandersDepartment of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Jorden E JacksonDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responding to identified needs for increased veterans' access to healthcare, in 2010 the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched the Veteran Community Partnership (VCP) initiative to "foster seamless access to, and transitions among, the full continuum of non-institutional extended care and support services in VA and the community". This initiative represents an important effort by VA to promote collaboration with a broad range of community organizations as equal partners in the service of veteran needs. The purpose of the study is an initial assessment of the VCP program. Focus group interviews conducted in six sites in 2015 included 53 representatives of the local VA and community organizations involved with rural and urban VCPs across the US. Interview topics included the experiences and practices of VCP members, perceived benefits and challenges, and the characteristics and dynamics of rural and urban areas served by VCPs. Using a community-oriented conceptual framework, the analyses address VCP processes and preliminary outcomes, including VCP goals and activities, and VCP members' perceptions of their efforts, benefits, challenges, and achievements. The results indicate largely positive perceptions of the VCP initiative and its early outcomes by both community and VA participants. Benefits and challenges vary by rural-urban community context and include resource limitations and the potential for VA dominance of other VCP partners. Although all VCPs identified significant benefits and challenges, time and resource constraints and local organizational dynamics varied by rural and urban context. Significant investments in VCPs will be required to increase their impacts.

Indexed as

VeteransHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansRural PopulationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairscommunity-engaged researchhealthcare accessVA-community partnershipsveterans

Identifiers

PMID34444083
PMCPMC8393772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.