Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34443980›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Human Body-Electrode Interfaces for Wide-Frequency Sensing and Communication: A Review.

Kurian Polachan, Baibhab Chatterjee, Scott Weigand, Shreyas Sen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nanoelectronics: Materials, Devices and Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kurian PolachanSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-834X
Baibhab ChatterjeeSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Scott WeigandEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Shreyas SenSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USEli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company CCSS 1944602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several on-body sensing and communication applications use electrodes in contact with the human body. Body-electrode interfaces in these cases act as a transducer, converting ionic current in the body to electronic current in the sensing and communication circuits and vice versa. An ideal body-electrode interface should have the characteristics of an electrical short, i.e., the transfer of ionic currents and electronic currents across the interface should happen without any hindrance. However, practical body-electrode interfaces often have definite impedances and potentials that hinder the free flow of currents, affecting the application's performance. Minimizing the impact of body-electrode interfaces on the application's performance requires one to understand the physics of such interfaces, how it distorts the signals passing through it, and how the interface-induced signal degradations affect the applications. Our work deals with reviewing these elements in the context of biopotential sensing and human body communication.

Indexed as

biopotential sensingbody–electrode interfacehuman body communication

Identifiers

PMID34443980
PMCPMC8401560
OpenAlexW3193984093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.