Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34443695›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Assessment of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Smoke Tainted Cabernet Sauvignon Wines Using a Low-Cost E-Nose and Machine Learning Modelling.

Vasiliki Summerson, Claudia Gonzalez Viejo, Alexis Pang, Damir D Torrico, Sigfredo Fuentes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasiliki SummersonDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Group, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Building 142, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7259-7924
Claudia Gonzalez ViejoDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Group, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Building 142, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-9307
Alexis PangDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Group, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Building 142, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-3456
Damir D TorricoDepartment of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1482-2438
Sigfredo FuentesDigital Agriculture, Food and Wine Group, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Building 142, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-5085
The University of Melbourne · AULincoln University · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wine aroma is an important quality trait in wine, influenced by its volatile compounds. Many factors can affect the composition and levels (concentration) of volatile aromatic compounds, including the water status of grapevines, canopy management, and the effects of climate change, such as increases in ambient temperature and drought. In this study, a low-cost and portable electronic nose (e-nose) was used to assess wines produced from grapevines exposed to different levels of smoke contamination. Readings from the e-nose were then used as inputs to develop two machine learning models based on artificial neural networks. Results showed that regression Model 1 displayed high accuracy in predicting the levels of volatile aromatic compounds in wine (R = 0.99). On the other hand, Model 2 also had high accuracy in predicting smoke aroma intensity from sensory evaluation (R = 0.97). Descriptive sensory analysis showed high levels of smoke taint aromas in the high-density smoke-exposed wine sample (HS), followed by the high-density smoke exposure with in-canopy misting treatment (HSM). Principal component analysis further showed that the HS treatment was associated with smoke aroma intensity, while results from the matrix showed significant negative correlations (

Indexed as

Electronic NoseMachine LearningSmokeGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMultivariate AnalysisNeural Networks, ComputerOdorantsPrincipal Component AnalysisVitisVolatile Organic CompoundsWineSmokeVolatile Organic Compoundsartificial neural networksbushfiresclimate changeelectronic nosemachine learningwine quality

Identifiers

PMID34443695
PMCPMC8398669
OpenAlexW3194002905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.