Capillary Electrophoresis as a Monitoring Tool for Flow Composition Determination.

Mihkel Kaljurand, Piret Saar-Reismaa, Merike Vaher, Jelena Gorbatsova, Jekaterina Mazina-Šinkar

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mihkel KaljurandFaculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19089 Tallinn, Estonia.

Piret Saar-ReismaaFaculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19089 Tallinn, Estonia.

Merike VaherFaculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19089 Tallinn, Estonia.

Jelena GorbatsovaFaculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19089 Tallinn, Estonia.

Jekaterina Mazina-ŠinkarFaculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19089 Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

Eesti Teadusfondi IUT 3320 and EAG14)International Visegrad Fund no. 21930006

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow analysis is the science of performing quantitative analytical chemistry in flowing streams. Because of its efficiency and speed of analysis, capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a prospective method for the monitoring of a flow composition withdrawn from various processes (e.g., occurring in bioreactors, fermentations, enzymatic assays, and microdialysis samples). However, interfacing CE to a various flow of interest requires further study. In this paper, several ingenious approaches on interfacing flow from various chemical or bioprocesses to a capillary electrophoresis instrument are reviewed. Most of these interfaces can be described as computer-controlled autosamplers. Even though most of the described interfaces waste too many samples, many interesting and important applications of the devices are reported. However, the lack of commercially available devices prevents the wide application of CE for flow analysis. On the contrary, this fact opens up a potential avenue for future research in the field of flow sampling by CE.

Indexed as

capillary electrophoresisflow analysismonitoringopen source hardware

Identifiers

PMID34443507

DOI10.3390/molecules26164918

PMCPMC8398840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.