ArticleMicromachines2021
Stimulus-Responsive Shrinkage in Electrospun Membranes: Fundamentals and Control.
Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiomyocyte Growth on Cardiac Infusible Extracellular Matrix-Coated and Annealed Biodegradable Polyurethane Fibers.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
- Recycling Textiles: From Post-Consumer Polyester Garments to Materials for Injection Molding.Polymers · 2025Article
- Ultra-Stretchable Polymer Fibers Anchored with a Triple-Level Self-Assembled Conductive Network for Wide-Range Strain Detection.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
- Electrospun polysuccinimide scaffolds containing different salts as potential wound dressing material.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024Article
- Influence of Electrospinning Setup Parameters on Properties of Polymer-Perovskite Nanofibers.Polymers · 2023Article
- Nanocomposite electrospun fibers of poly(ε-caprolactone)/bioactive glass with shape memory properties.Bioactive materials · 2022Article
- Shape-Memory Materials via Electrospinning: A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Shrinkage is observed in many electrospun membranes. The stretched conformation of the macromolecular chains has been proposed as the possible cause. However, so far, our understanding of the fundamentals is still qualitative and cannot provide much help in the shrinkage control. In this paper, based on the crimped fibers after stimulus-induced shrinkage, a clear evidence of buckling, the gradient pre-strain field in the cross-section of the electrospun fibers, which is the result of a gradient solidification field and a tensile force in the fibers during electrospinning, is identified as the underlying mechanism for the stimulus-induced shrinkage. Subsequently, two buckling conditions are derived. Subsequently, a series of experiments are carried out to reveal the influence of four typical processing parameters (namely, the applied voltage, solution concentration, distance between electrodes, and rotation speed of collector), which are highly relevant to the formation of the gradient pre-strain field. It is concluded that there are some different ways to achieve the required shrinkage ratios in two in-plane directions (i.e., the rotational and transverse directions of the roller collector). Some of the combinations of these parameters are more effective at achieving high uniformity than others. Hence, it is possible to optimize the processing parameters to produce high-quality membranes with well-controlled shrinkage in both in-plane directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.