ReviewMicromachines2021
Ultrasonic Particle Manipulation in Glass Capillaries: A Concise Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- On-demand rotational manipulation of microparticles and zebrafish larvae via orthogonally phased BAW acoustofluidics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- 3D printing monolithic, multifunctional polymer acoustofluidic devices with tunable mixing and particle focusing.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- A hybrid acoustofluidic device with Parafilm® that operates as a traditional bulk acoustic wave or flexural plate wave device.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Acoustic Cell Patterning for Structured Cell-Laden Hydrogel Fibers/Tubules.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Review of Ultrasonic Particle Manipulation Techniques: Applications and Research Advances.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Effects of Side Profile on Acoustic Streaming by Oscillating Microstructures in Channel.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Potential of the acoustic micromanipulation technologies for biomedical research.Biomicrofluidics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasonic particle manipulation (UPM), a non-contact and label-free method that uses ultrasonic waves to manipulate micro- or nano-scale particles, has recently gained significant attention in the microfluidics community. Moreover, glass is optically transparent and has dimensional stability, distinct acoustic impedance to water and a high acoustic quality factor, making it an excellent material for constructing chambers for ultrasonic resonators. Over the past several decades, glass capillaries are increasingly designed for a variety of UPMs, e.g., patterning, focusing, trapping and transporting of micron or submicron particles. Herein, we review established and emerging glass capillary-transducer devices, describing their underlying mechanisms of operation, with special emphasis on the application of glass capillaries with fluid channels of various cross-sections (i.e., rectangular, square and circular) on UPM. We believe that this review will provide a superior guidance for the design of glass capillary-based UPM devices for acoustic tweezers-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.