Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442338›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Machine Learning Approaches to Predict In-Hospital Mortality among Neonates with Clinically Suspected Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Jen-Fu Hsu, Ying-Feng Chang, Hui-Jun Cheng, Chi Yang, Chun-Yuan Lin, Shih-Ming Chu, Hsuan-Rong Huang, Ming-Chou Chiang, Hsiao-Chin Wang, Ming-Horng Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jen-Fu HsuDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0798-5378
Ying-Feng ChangArtificial Intelligence Research Center and Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Hui-Jun ChengDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Providence University, Taichung 433301, Taiwan.
Chi YangArtificial Intelligence Research Center and Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1676-5185
Chun-Yuan LinArtificial Intelligence Research Center and Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1796-6189
Shih-Ming ChuDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Hsuan-Rong HuangDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Ming-Chou ChiangDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Chin WangDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Ming-Horng TsaiSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0343-2370
Chang Gung University · TWAsia University · TWProvidence University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundpreterm and critically ill neonates often experience clinically suspected sepsis during their prolonged hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), which can be the initial sign of final adverse outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to utilize machine learning approaches to predict neonatal in-hospital mortality through data-driven learning.

methodsa total of 1095 neonates who experienced clinically suspected sepsis in a tertiary-level NICU in Taiwan between August 2017 and July 2020 were enrolled. Clinically suspected sepsis was defined based on clinical features and laboratory criteria and the administration of empiric antibiotics by clinicians. The variables used for analysis included patient demographics, clinical features, laboratory data, and medications. The machine learning methods used included deep neural network (DNN), k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boost. The performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsthe final in-hospital mortality of this cohort was 8.2% (90 neonates died). A total of 765 (69.8%) and 330 (30.2%) patients were randomly assigned to the training and test sets, respectively. Regarding the efficacy of the single model that most accurately predicted the outcome, DNN exhibited the greatest AUC (0.923, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.953-0.893) and the best accuracy (95.64%, 95% CI 96.76-94.52%), Cohen's kappa coefficient value (0.74, 95% CI 0.79-0.69) and Matthews correlation coefficient value (0.75, 95% CI 0.80-0.70). The top three most influential variables in the DNN importance matrix plot were the requirement of ventilator support at the onset of suspected sepsis, the feeding conditions, and intravascular volume expansion. The model performance was indistinguishable between the training and test sets.

conclusionsthe DNN model was successfully established to predict in-hospital mortality in neonates with clinically suspected sepsis, and the machine learning algorithm is applicable for clinicians to gain insights and have better communication with families in advance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebig data analysisearly predictionmachine learningneonatal mortality

Identifiers

PMID34442338
PMCPMC8400295
OpenAlexW3183837412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.