Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442267›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

The Native Bees of Texas: Evaluating the Benefits of a Public Engagement Course.

Laurel Treviño Murphy, Shelly Engelman, John L Neff, Shalene Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurel Treviño MurphyOutreach Program, Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, 401 Biological Laboratories, 205 W 24th Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Shelly EngelmanResearch and Evaluation, Custom EduEval LLC, Austin, TX 78749, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6482-6491
John L NeffCentral Texas Melittological Institute, Austin, TX 78731, USA.
Shalene JhaDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-6106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declines in native bee communities due to forces of global change have become an increasing public concern. Despite this heightened interest, there are few publicly available courses on native bees, and little understanding of how participants might benefit from such courses. In October of 2018 and 2019, we taught the 'Native Bees of Texas' course to the public at The University of Texas at Austin Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center botanical gardens in an active learning environment with slide-based presentations, printed photo-illustrated resources, and direct insect observations. In this study, we evaluated course efficacy and learning outcomes with a pre/post-course test, a survey, and open-ended feedback, focused on quality improvement findings. Overall, participants' test scores increased significantly, from 60% to 87% correct answers in 2018 and from 64% to 87% in 2019, with greater post-course differences in ecological knowledge than in identification skills. Post-course, the mean of participants' bee knowledge self-ratings was 4.56 on a five-point scale. The mean of participants' ratings of the degree to which they attained the course learning objectives was 4.43 on a five-point scale. Assessment results provided evidence that the course enriched participants' knowledge of native bee ecology and conservation and gave participants a basic foundation in bee identification. This highlights the utility of systematic course evaluations in public engagement efforts related to biodiversity conservation.

Indexed as

biodiversityconservationidentification skillslearning outcomesperceived knowledgepollinator insectsSTEM outreach

Identifiers

PMID34442267
PMCPMC8396608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.