Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442249›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Abundant Citizen Science Data Reveal That the Peacock Butterfly

Marc Herremans, Karin Gielen, Jos Van Kerckhoven, Pieter Vanormelingen, Wim Veraghtert, Kristijn R R Swinnen, Dirk Maes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc HerremansNatuurpunt Studie, Coxiestraat 11, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9719-8732
Karin GielenNatuurpunt Studie, Coxiestraat 11, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
Jos Van KerckhovenNatuurpunt Studie, Coxiestraat 11, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
Pieter VanormelingenNatuurpunt Studie, Coxiestraat 11, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-4454
Wim VeraghtertNatuurpunt Studie, Coxiestraat 11, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
Kristijn R R SwinnenNatuurpunt Studie, Coxiestraat 11, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
Dirk MaesResearch Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Herman Teirlinckgebouw, Havenlaan 88 Box 73, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7947-3788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peacock butterfly is abundant and widespread in Europe. It is generally believed to be univoltine (one generation per year): adults born in summer overwinter and reappear again in spring to reproduce. However, recent flight patterns in western Europe mostly show three peaks during the year: a first one in spring (overwintering butterflies), a second one in early summer (offspring of the spring generation), and a third one in autumn. It was thus far unclear whether this autumn flight peak was a second new generation or consisted of butterflies flying again in autumn after a summer rest (aestivation). The life cycle of one of Europe's most common butterflies is therefore still surprisingly inadequately understood. We used hundreds of thousands of observations and thousands of pictures submitted by naturalists from the public to the online portal observation.orgin Belgium and analyzed relations between flight patterns, condition (wear), reproductive cycles, peak abundances, and phenology to clarify the current life history. We demonstrate that peacocks have shifted towards two new generations per year in recent decades. Mass citizen science data in online portals has become increasingly important in tracking the response of biodiversity to rapid environmental changes such as climate change.

Indexed as

Aglais ioBelgiumbivoltinechange in voltinismcitizen scienceclimate changelife history strategypeacock butterfly

Identifiers

PMID34442249
PMCPMC8396639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.