Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442223›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Associations between Personality Traits, Intolerance of Uncertainty, Coping Strategies, and Stress in Italian Frontline and Non-Frontline HCWs during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Multi-Group Path-Analysis.

Ramona Bongelli, Carla Canestrari, Alessandra Fermani, Morena Muzi, Ilaria Riccioni, Alessia Bertolazzi, Roberto Burro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Believing Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Robust Italian Validation of the Coping Humor Scale (RI-CHS) for Adult Health Care Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramona BongelliDepartment of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3764-3929
Carla CanestrariDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5713-6281
Alessandra FermaniDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1276-4660
Morena MuziDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.
Ilaria RiccioniDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-6012
Alessia BertolazziDepartment of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.
Roberto BurroDepartment of Human Sciences, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4491-2015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic represented a very difficult physical and psychological challenge for the general population and even more for healthcare workers (HCWs). The main aim of the present study is to test whether there were significant differences between frontline and non-frontline Italian HCWs concerning (a) personality traits, intolerance of uncertainty, coping strategies and perceived stress, and (b) the models of their associations. A total of 682 Italian HCWs completed a self-report questionnaire: 280 employed in COVID-19 wards and 402 in other wards. The analysis of variance omnibus test revealed significant differences between the two groups only for perceived stress, which was higher among the frontline. The multi-group path analysis revealed significant differences in the structure of the associations between the two groups of HCWs, specifically concerning the relations between: personality traits and intolerance of uncertainty; intolerance of uncertainty and coping strategies. Regarding the relation between coping strategies and stress no difference was identified between the two groups. In both of them, emotionally focused coping was negatively related with perceived stress, whereas dysfunctional coping was positively related with stress. These results could be useful in planning actions aiming to reduce stress and improve the effectiveness of HCWs' interventions. Training programs aimed to provide HCWs with a skillset to tackle uncertain and stressful circumstances could represent an appropriate support to develop a preventive approach during outbreaks.

Indexed as

coping strategiesCOVID-19HCWsintolerance of uncertaintyperceived stresspersonality traits

Identifiers

PMID34442223
PMCPMC8391534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.