Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442182›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Patterns of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Utilization by Various Dental Specialties: A 4-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Dental and Maxillofacial Specialty Center.

Silvina Friedlander-Barenboim, Wafi Hamed, Avraham Zini, Noam Yarom, Itzhak Abramovitz, Harry Chweidan, Tamar Finkelstein, Galit Almoznino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating Factors Influencing Periodontal Bone Loss Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvina Friedlander-BarenboimThe Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Oral Medicine Unit, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Wafi HamedOral and Maxillofacial Center, Department of Prosthodontics, Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan 02149, Israel.
Avraham ZiniHadassah Medical Center, Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Noam YaromThe Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Oral Medicine Unit, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Itzhak AbramovitzHadassah Medical Center, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Harry ChweidanOral and Maxillofacial Center, Department of Prosthodontics, Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan 02149, Israel.
Tamar FinkelsteinThe Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Oral Medicine Unit, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Galit AlmozninoHadassah Medical Center, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-0047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the uses of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis and treatment in various dental specialties. This 4-year cross-sectional study analyzed the records of 1409 individuals who underwent a CBCT at the Oral and Maxillofacial Center at Sheba Medical Center, Israel. The average age of the patients was 27.9 ± 11.5 (range: 9-86 years). Patients were referred for CBCT by the following departments: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (1063; 75.5%), Endodontics (182; 12.9%), Periodontology (122; 8.6%) and Orthodontics (42; 3.0%). Most CBCT radiographs evaluated the maxilla (774; 55.0%), followed by the mandible (481; 34.1%) and both (154; 10.9%). The target anatomical structures included: bone (694; 49.3%), teeth (307; 21.7%), and both jaws (408; 29.0%). The main indications for CBCT use were: assessment of anatomical structures and implant sites (787; 55.9%), determine root canals morphology (182; 12.9%), visualization of impacted teeth, tooth alignment, and localization (177; 12.6%), suspected cysts or tumors (148; 10.5%), evaluation of Temporomandibular joint disorders (106; 7.5%) and other reasons (9; 0.6%). In 279 (19.8%) of cases, the diagnosis changed following CBCT, mainly in Orthodontics tooth analysis (28 (66.7%);

Indexed as

cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)dental radiologymaxillofacial radiology

Identifiers

PMID34442182
PMCPMC8392371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.