Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442175›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy of Family Carers for Their Older Parents in Japan.

Hiroko Costantini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vaccine literacy: A concept analysis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The Determinants of Vaccine Literacy in the Italian Population: Results from the Health Literacy Survey 2019.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Willingness to Pay for a Hypothetical Vaccine for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroko CostantiniObservatoire Sociologique du Changement (OSC), Sciences Po and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2775-1106

Funding

European Commission 753717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In super-ageing Japan, COVID-19 vaccinations were starting to reach older people as of June 2021, which raises the issue of vaccine literacy. This study focuses on family members who work and also care for their older parents, as they are at risk of COVID-19 and also risk transmitting COVID-19 to the parents they care for and potentially influencing their parents' vaccine uptake. Such family carers are central to the approach in Japan to achieving a sustainable and resilient society in response to ageing. Contrasting family carers' COVID-19 vaccine literacy with their overall health literacy provides insights into their preparedness for COVID-19 vaccinations. The purpose of this study is to understand how vaccine literacy, compared to health literacy, varies across family carers and the sources of information they use. Through a cross-sectional online survey, family carers' vaccine literacy, health literacy and their sources of information, including mass media, social media, health and care professionals, family, colleagues, friends, and others, were assessed. The participants' (

Indexed as

COVID-19family carers for older adultshealth communicationsJapanmass mediasustainable ageing societyvaccine literacy

Identifiers

PMID34442175
PMCPMC8393727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.