Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442162›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Compounding Parenteral Products in Pediatric Wards-Effect of Environment and Aseptic Technique on Product Sterility.

Sonja Virtanen, Karmen Kapp, Maria Rautamo, Lotta Schepel, Carita Lindén-Lahti, Cristina D Cruz, Päivi Tammela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Sterility Testing for Hematopoietic Stem Cells.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sonja VirtanenDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, P.O.Box 56 (Viikinkaari 5E), University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Karmen KappDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, P.O.Box 56 (Viikinkaari 5E), University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Maria RautamoHUS Pharmacy, HUS Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Stenbäckinkatu 9B, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Lotta SchepelHUS Pharmacy, HUS Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Stenbäckinkatu 9B, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Carita Lindén-LahtiHUS Pharmacy, HUS Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Stenbäckinkatu 9B, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Cristina D CruzDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, P.O.Box 56 (Viikinkaari 5E), University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-8563
Päivi TammelaDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, P.O.Box 56 (Viikinkaari 5E), University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4697-8066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenteral products must be compounded using an aseptic technique to ensure sterility of the medicine. We compared the effect of three clinical environments as compounding areas as well as different aseptic techniques on the sterility of the compounded parenteral product. Clinical pharmacists and pediatric nurses compounded 220 samples in total in three clinical environments: a patient room, a medicine room and biological safety cabinet. The study combined four methods: observation, environmental monitoring (settle plates), monitoring of personnel (finger dab plates) and sterility testing (membrane filtration). Of the compounded samples, 99% were sterile and no significant differences emerged between the clinical environments. Based on the settle plates, the biological safety cabinet was the only area that fulfilled the requirements for eliminating microbial contamination. Most of the steps on the observation form for aseptic techniques were followed. All participants disinfected their hands, wore gloves and disinfected the septum of the vial. Non-contaminated finger dab plates were mostly detected after compounding in the biological safety cabinet. Aseptic techniques were followed relatively well in all environments. However, these results emphasize the importance of good aseptic techniques and support the recommendation of compounding parenteral products in biological safety cabinets in clinical environments.

Indexed as

aseptic techniquecompoundingparenteral productspatient safetypediatricssterility test

Identifiers

PMID34442162
PMCPMC8393854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.