Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442111›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Female Genital Mutilation: Knowledge and Skills of Health Professionals.

Brígida Molina-Gallego, Laura Mordillo-Mateos, Gonzalo Melgar de Corral, Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino, Begoña Polonio-López, M Idoia Ugarte-Gurrutxaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of female genital mutilation laws, policies, and professional codes of conduct on healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, skills, and quality of care: A mixed-method review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brígida Molina-GallegoFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, Campus Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45004 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-628X
Laura Mordillo-MateosFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, 45600 Talavera de la Reina (Toledo), Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3754-2279
Gonzalo Melgar de CorralFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, Campus Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45004 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8212-7168
Sagrario Gómez-CantarinoFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, Campus Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45004 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9640-0409
Begoña Polonio-LópezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, 45600 Talavera de la Reina (Toledo), Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2922-7519
M Idoia Ugarte-GurrutxagaFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, Campus Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45004 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-3628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale genital mutilation (FGM) is any process that injures female genitals for non-medical reasons and is a violation of women's human rights. An important number of women from countries where FGM is performed are arriving to Western countries. Health professionals are important for detecting cases of FGM. No surveys to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices on FGM among healthcare professionals has been conducted in Castilla la Mancha (Spain) until now.

methodsThe main goal of the study is assessing knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals in relation to FGM. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted based on self-administered online surveys to nurses, midwives, family doctors, pediatricians, obstetrics and gynecologists.

resultsIn total, 1168 professionals answered the surveys. Just 13.9% indicated that they had received training in FGM, however just 10.7% correctly identified the three types of FGM, 10.7% the countries where it is usually practiced, 33.9% knew the legislation in Spain and only 4.4% found a case of FGM during their professional practice. Regarding the knowledge about protocols, 8.64% of the sample indicated to know one of them.

conclusionThe present study demonstrate that it is necessary to improve the training and awareness of healthcare professionals related to FGM in Castilla la Mancha.

Indexed as

female genital mutilationhealthcare professionalswomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID34442111
PMCPMC8392609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.