Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442087›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Medical Faculty's and Students' Perceptions toward Pediatric Electronic OSCE during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia.

Lana A Shaiba, Mahdi A Alnamnakani, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Nurah Alamro, Fahad Alsohime, Abdulkarim Alrabiaah, Shahad N Alanazi, Khalid Alhasan, Adi Alherbish, Khalid F Mobaireek and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Feasibility and reliability of the pandemic-adapted online-onsite hybrid graduation OSCE in Japan.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lana A ShaibaCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5459-7020
Mahdi A AlnamnakaniCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad-Hani TemsahCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-9322
Nurah AlamroCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlsohimeCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulkarim AlrabiaahCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad N AlanaziCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AlhasanCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-8536
Adi AlherbishCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid F MobaireekCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad A BashiriCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-6727
Yazed AlRuthiaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project RSP-2021/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe educational process in different medical schools has been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. As a part of the Saudi government's attempts to contain the spread of the virus, schools' and universities' educational activities and face-to-face lectures have been modified to virtual classrooms. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of the faculty and the students of an electronic objective structured clinical examination (E-OSCE) activity that took place during the COVID-19 pandemic in the oldest medical school in Saudi Arabia.

methodsAn e-OSCE style examination was designed for the final-year medical students by the pediatrics department, College of Medicine at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The examination was administered by Zoom™ video conferencing where both students and faculty participated through their laptop or desktop computers. In order to explore the students' and the faculty's perceptions about this experience, a newly designed 13-item online questionnaire was administered at the end of the e-OSCE.

resultsOut of 136 participants (23 faculty and 112 students), 73 respondents (e.g., 54% response rate) filled out the questionnaire. Most of the respondents (69.8%) were very comfortable with this new virtual experience. Most participants (53.4%) preferred the e-OSCE compared to the classic face-to-face clinical OSCE during the pandemic. Regarding the e-OSCE assessment student tool, 46.6% reported that it is similar to the classic face-to-face OSCE; however, 38.4% felt it was worse.

conclusionsThe e-OSCE can be a very effective alternative to the classic face-to-face OSCE due to the current circumstances that still pose a significant risk of infection transmission. Future studies should examine different virtual strategies to ensure effective OSCE delivery from the perspective of both faculty and students.

Indexed as

assessmentCOVID-19distance learningeducationalfinal year medical studentsOSCEpandemicpediatric

Identifiers

PMID34442087
PMCPMC8393546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.